Reading Inji with a value proposition lens: the price model is the real lock in

In our ID30 Analysis Lens series, we take a well known building block of digital public infrastructure and read its value proposition through a structured framework. This time: Inji, the MOSIP credentialing stack that lets a government issue, hold and verify a citizen’s credentials, online, offline, even from a paper QR code.

Read through the Outside In 6 box, Inji’s promise is clean and rare: credentials a government fully owns, that leave no citizen behind. Sovereignty and inclusion in a single line.

The block a finance ministry should read twice

The lock in that hurts a national programme is rarely the wallet or the credential format. It is the price model. A solution can look free at signature, then the meter moves to pay on issuance and, the vicious one, pay on every verification.

Pay on verification is a perpetual tax on your own success. The more services you connect and the more citizens transact, the bigger the bill, and per verification fees also deter relying parties from integrating, which quietly strangles the network effect that made the infrastructure worth building.

Where Inji answers, and where governance takes over

Open source and self hosted, you pay for the software, not for the use. Cost is decoupled from adoption.

The caveat we always add for governments: open source removes the toll only if you procure the cost model on purpose. A managed service with per call pricing can put the toll booth back through the side door. The real question is not whether a solution is free today, but who collects a fee every time a citizen proves who they are, ten years from now.

Explore Inji: https://www.inji.io/.

Analytical framework: the 6 Elements value proposition method, created by Mat Shore (Outside In).

Want to comment, ask a question, or join the discussion? Continue the conversation on LinkedIn.